Sunday, July 12, 2009

And Another Scottish Thing...

Thought I'd just spread the word about Donna Moore's newish blog which you can find by clicking. CLICK.

Donna is funny on paper and in person so if you're looking for a bright spot to your day, she could very well be it. Scroll down on her blog for her trip to San Francisco.

Scroll down on this blog for my thoughts on her fellow Scot Russel McLean. He's also funny in person but then on paper he gets all noiry and makes you think about still waters and whether they run deep or whether they're just still...

Russel McLean's book... And a possible contest

was the fodder for my first Amazon review. Take a look. And a good book it was too. How do I know it was good? Well, first because I read it. I think that's a John Locke's primary experience type thing, no? But more importantly because I can still see images from the story and it has been months. Also, I can imagine the main character, J. McNee, doing things other than what he's shown to do in the novel. A secondary experience, no?

In any event, I do recommend the book if you're a fan of noir and/or Sottish people. Plenty of both in The Good Son.

Also, I will also be asking Mr. McLean a few questions about his writing and such and I hope to sell that (euphemistically since cash does not actually change hands...there again, can one do something euphemistically?) to Crimespree Magazine.

Now, in my review at Amazon, I say the the book present the world with the first Scottish PI. If I'm wrong, please show me the evidence. And I do mean Scottish PI working in Scotland with a license and everything. If you're the first to prove me wrong, I'll send you a brand new hardcover book. It might even be a copy of Russel's book though that would have to wait until it is out in this country since I don't fancy paying more for shipping than I did for the actual book again.

Visit with Russel at his blog. He doesn't bite.

Monday, June 29, 2009

AHMM and EQMM Giveaway

I've got a dozen (or more) EQMM/AHMM magazines from the last year or three sitting around clogging up bookshelf space. Anyone want them? Leave a comment to that effect and I'll check back tomorrow. If there's more than one interested party, I'll pick from a hat. Same contest at NASTY.BRUTISH.SHORT so you have two chances to win (that is, I've got two boxes of magazines primed for the post office...)

Monday, June 01, 2009

A Bit More Business...

Lastly, I have two other short stories out and about now. And another story that is being looked at at Alfred Hitchcock.
First, if you rush out now, you can get one of my stories ("Caring for Jose") in an anthology of Latino mystery fiction called "HITLIST." This is put out by Arte Publico Press and, in case you were worried, a- it's all in English, and b- there are other, better writers in it - Mario Acevedo and Manuel Ramos for starters.John Lantigua and Lucha Corpi, too. Many others. My story is a Luis Gonzalo story, and I can guarantee that none of the other writers can say that...

Also, later this summer, the good people at Spinetingler Magazine will be publishing another of my short stories. It's called "The Dean," and it's about a dean. It's also about roaches and sexual harassment. Not a mystery. Kind of science fictiony. Maybe a horror story if you're not a fan of roaches...


The story I have at AHMM is called "The Most Dangerous Man in New York City, 1969-1977." It's not a romance. Nor is it cozy. It introduces a not very nice man named Ray Cruz who hurts and kills people for a living. Sounds like a terrible job, but then, somebody's got to do it.

Hope it gets picked because publication in AHMM means a paycheck and baby needs a new pair of shoes. Seriously.

Friday, May 29, 2009

More writerly news

Jen Jordan has put together another of her excellent anthologies for Bleak House and I'm in it. Ms. Jordan is a supporter of my writing which pleases me greatly since she's a woman of otherwise great taste. In any event, the book is called UNCAGE ME, and my story is titled "The Biography of Stoop, the Thief, Chapter Three: Stoop and Elizabeth."*

In any event, this is an anthology with one of the most stellar lineups of writers that you'll ever come across. To quote the product description: "Scott Phillips, Allan Guthrie, Christa Faust, Victor Gischler, J.A. Konrath, J.D. Rhoades, Declan Burke, Brian Azzarello, Steven Torres, Stewart Macbride, Simon Kernick, Patrick Bagley, Greg Bardsley, Stephen Blackmore, Tim Maleeny, Nick Stone, Martyn Waites, Talia Berliner, Maxim Jakubowski, Gregg Hurwitz, Blake Crouch, and more!"

Usually "and more" or "and others" refers to me...


In any event, here is what Publisher's Weekly had to say about the collection and my story in particular:

Publishers Weekly- -
While John Connolly ("The Reapers") rightly notes in his introduction that this all- original anthology isn't for the fainthearted, noir lovers will find plenty to savor among the 22 stories from both familiar and unfamiliar names. Steven Torres offers the most moving selection, The Biography of Stoop, the Thief, in which a 14- year- old boy tries to save the mother who abandoned him for a life on the streets as a substance abuser. Tim Maleeny's Prisoner of Love not only features twists and betrayals but manages to make an ambiguous resolution satisfying rather than frustrating. There are some duds, like Maxim Jakubowski's shocker We Mate in the Dark, with its pointless savagery, but on the whole the contributors demonstrate the ability to create believable and memorable characters as well as settings in a few pages.


Now, if you visit Jen Jordan's site, you get an explanation for the one negative comment. (Scroll to the May 22 entry.) Here I'll say a word about the positive comment about my story...It is the first positive thing PW has had to say about anything I've written so I'm quite excited. In the past, they accused me of writing gratuitous sex and violence (that of a book without a single sex scene... The next week another review called my writing "music for the soul". Study in contrasts...) and called one of my books "pointless." (Either that or useless, can't recall... Possibly both.) In any event, it is nice that PW has finally hopped on the Steven Torres bandwagon. A wagon which carries myself, my mother, Jen Jordan, and now PW...

More business news tomorrow.



* The long title is a little more than an affectation - There is a "Biography of Stoop, the Thief, Chapter One: Stoop and Clyde" out there (published by Crimespree some years ago) which is one of my favorite stories. Chapter Two is unpublished.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

The New Book

Blackout in Precinct Puerto Rico. As I said yesterday, the title wasn't my idea and I kind of like it though there really isn't a blackout in the book...yet.

I still owe St. Martins a few thousand words on it. Here's the thing...The book is the first one I wrote and the third one I sold to SMP, but the fifth that they're publishing. And, unlike many first novels, I think it is actually quite good. In fact, I think it's the strongest of the Precinct Puerto Rico novels. I'll go a step further and say that this PPR novel beats the other PPR novels with a stick. I won't say it leaves them for dead since I'm partial to the first published (third written). Is it good? Yes. Not quite at the contractually required length, so I'll be adding a couple of scenes to make it less an inverted mystery and more straightforward.

But if it's not actually about a blackout, then what's it about? (I hearing you thinking that.) It's about Luis Gonzalo trying to figure what happened to this teenaged girl he found beaten and naked in the middle of the night - she won't say a word, so he has a bit of guesswork he has to conduct and it's about what happens when his guesswork leads him to the possibility (not the conclusion, just one possibility among several) that the girl's father was responsible. The father can't remember what he was doing at the time except to say it involved a lot of drinking (see? blackout).

Now I've said a fair bit about the story, but not the good bits. And of course what we all want to know (we meaning you, not me since I've read the thing already) is whether Gonzalo figures things out at all because I'll tell you since the victim won't say a word, this one's a puzzler. Well, you'll have to wait until April.

BLACKOUT IN PRECINCT PUERTO RICO. Buy it today!!!

More writerly news tomorrow.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Writerly news...

Well, if the first four Precinct Puerto Rico weren't enough for the world (and frankly, were I to judge from sales I'd have said the first one was more than enough) then there is going to be a fifth to satiate a demanding public. I've been given a pub date from St. Martins Press, and we're looking at April of 2010. This is great news for me since, of course, having a book published a very nice thing. Also, it means I'll get more money from SMP as they pay out the other half of my advance. Baby needs a new pair of shoes and by next April, she'll be able to get them...

The book will be called...Get ready... BLACKOUT IN PRECINCT PUERTO RICO. Readers of this blog and of my books, or even just people who've run into me casually will know that I don't name my books. SMP does that. I was surprised by this particular title for two reasons - 1. given that we have to have the phrase "precinct puerto rico" in the title (their idea, not mine) this title isn't really all that bad, but 2. there isn't actually a blackout mentioned in the book. Of course it has been a while since I wrote the thing so I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

Anyway, for that part of the world that has been waiting for another Precinct Puerto Rico book, it's coming.

Tune in tomorrow and, if I remember, I will tell you something about the storyline and whether or not I think this is the greatest of the Precinct Puerto Rico books yet.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Another Bronx Puerto Rican done good..

And it's not me. Ah well. Still it is a pride filling day for Sonia Sotomayor and all her family. And as a Puerto Rican, of course, I am familia too. No doubt she'll be grilled. Almost no doubt, however, that she'll be confirmed. The neighborhood she grew up in was quite rough back when the Bronx was the Wild East. It's still not that nice a place. Still, she gives hope, no? It's hard, but it can be done. You can move up, move out, make a difference, control your destiny. Good for her. Good for me.

Tomorrow, if I'm lucky, a little news about that whole writing career thing...

Monday, March 16, 2009

Wait...

I just noticed the following title by the enormously successful Janet Evanovich - FINGER LICKIN' FIFTEEN. I'm going to take the plunge and say this is probably the fifteenth entry in the Stephanie Plum series. Haven't read the series. I'm sure it's lovely. No knock on Ms. Evanovich either. I don't know her. Never met her and in all my Bouchercon forays - more on that later - I don't think we've ever been in the same room at the same time.

But...have I missed something? Do people say "finger lickin' fifteen"? Has there been a KFC promo I'm not aware of? (I do try to stay informed.) Fine if it's a cliche or pun that I'm just not picking up. Anyway, I'm sure it's a good book. Titles for my own books have never yet been left up to me. Every single title has been imposed by outside forces. Maybe that happened here.

In any event, if you've read this far, sould you recommend a Lawrence Block title? I've never read him either. Something recent please.

Wait...

Monday, March 09, 2009

I've never read...

Robert B. Parker. There. I've said it. And there's even a reason for the oversight - in fact, it's not really an oversight at all. Ever since I became interested in mysteries about ten years ago, I've been hearing about Parker and, frankly, it is always along the lines of "Mr. Parker phoned in another novel. Don't waste your time unless you're a die-hard fan." Because of reviews like this,I never gave him a chance. Life being short and all that.

Still, I'm wondering what I'm missing. So I'm asking for a recommendation. But... Unlike most readers, I'm not that interested in the history of the author - that is, I don't want his "breakthrough" novel. I want to know what is his most recent novel that you think is a must read. Has he written anything in the past ten years that is absolutely "can't miss" material?

Or am I right to think that Parker's ability to "wow" a reader went stale in the 1980s?

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

Not Trying to Start Anything, But... (Political)

I don't understand the Rush Limbaugh thing. When it comes to politics, I should say I'm about as likely to vote Dem as Rep. I'm listed as an Independent, but even that's not an overt political thing for me - I just find both sides sometimes do stupid things and both sides sometimes do smart things.

But Limbaugh? Really? He's the leader? That pretty much guts the GOP doesn't it? I mean, Limbaugh IS an entertainer, for goodness sake. I understand he has an Oprah-like platform, millions of people listen in everyday, etc. Fine. I get that and the kow-towing that comes with it. Certainly, nobody wants to piss him off intentionally. Understood. Hell, it would even be rude to in a certain way, but COME ON! He's a voice on the radio. He's not a leader. I can tell he's not a leader. Want to know how I'm so sure? He doesn't hold public office. As far as I know. Has he ever had to try to push a single bit of legislation through? Or make an executive decision that didn't involve donuts*?

Rush is a Monday morning quarterback. He puts spin on what real leaders have done. Frankly, if I were Mr. Steele, I wouldn't have taken back what I said. If there were enough pressure for me to do so, I'd rather quit than stroke Mr. Limbaugh's ego...Or any other part of him. Most likely, I wouldn't have responded to Rush's tirade. If anything, I would have put out a clarification that said: "We of the Republican party want America to succeed. We will work with the President to ensure that happens."
Or,
Given my penchant for sarcasm, I might have said something more like, "Sorry to Rush Limbaugh, I didn't mean to offend him. I thought for sure he was still high as a kite and wouldn't be paying attention..."




* Not a knock on his weight. I make executive decisions about donuts almost daily.

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Follow the link...

Absolutely hilarious, I think. I had to check this wasn't an article from The Onion. RYANAIR seems to be run by absolute loons. That or the travelling public in Ireland is accustomed to a very low level of customer service. Anyway, here's the link.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Okay, This Isn't Crime, But...

Just thought this story needed comment. What the hell is wrong with this country...? I'm really lost on this one. Really? Now people are complaining when the airlines DO give out peanuts?

So what's next? "I'm allergic to heights, couldn't the plane just run along the highways really, really quickly?"

Baseball Question...

If the next years of Albert Pujols's career copy the first eight years, would we say he was a greater hitter than Stan Musial? Just about all his numbers would trump Musial's, but Musial is revered, so...

At this point, Pujols has a slightly better batting average, and much better power numbers than Musial. Even a better on base percentage.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Picture Worth a Thousand

Call me a sucker for pictures where children's lives are being saved. In any event, the picture says so much about humankindness, and its historical context says so much about unhumankindness. The contrast between how it played out and how it could have played, between the breathe of life shared with an infant and the possibility (even if only entertained for an instant) of denying that infant the breathe because of her race makes the picture glorious, I think. Overcoming and all that. So different from Birmingham of a few years earlier. Thank you Mr. Carroll.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Prince Harry Steps in it

The funny thing about this story...Go ahead, read it, then come back to see if you agree with my take. I'll wait.

Good. Now, the funny thing about this story to me is that the comedian had no snappy comeback ready. The prince says "You don't sound like a black chap," and my initial reaction was "And you, sir, don't at all sound unintelligent." Can you say that to a royal in England without being arrested? Don't know. I suspect one might get in trouble. It is, after all, a monarchy. And Prince Charles carries a sword.

I begin to think that Harry does not have all screws properly tightened. Of course, he'll never be king. Elizabeth is healthy and so is Charles and so is William. Not to mention the fact that Harry has never been able to actually comb his hair let alone manage a nation...Or do they leave the actual management of things to professionals?

Monday, February 09, 2009

Reading and Writing

Been reading short stories in the mystery field recently. Mostly from AHMM and EQMM. People sometimes complain about the lack of violence and naughty words in those publications, as though REAL LIFE were nothing but violence and cussing. Still, there is something in these magazines that is worthwhile - some of the stories are true puzzlers which, a) are not easy to write well and b) might just be what saves the mystery industry.

In any event, my reviews of some of those short stories can be found at Nasty. Brutish. Short.

In the world of writing, I've have put together a story I think might well be the best one I've done so far in my life. I sent it off to AHMM and will try EQMM if that doesn't work. If neither of those works, I'll try something else to get it published, but I'm not sure what. It's about what happens when a couple of detectives try to head off a mob war in 1971 NYC. I called it "The Most Dangerous Man in New York City, 1969-1977: Winter 1971." Pretentious? Probably, but I was trying for just accurate. Anyway, the star of the show is a hitman named Ray Cruz. A nasty bit of work, but the story still manages to have a laugh or two in it.

I've decided that I'm quite tired of writing short stories that net no income. A lot of effort. Not nearly as much reward. Not that every piece needs to bring in a paycheck, just that I've published 18 stories and been paid well three times, paid poorly about three more times and paid not at all a dozen times. Of course, of course, I know, I know. That's just the way things are. But does it have to be? Really?

Mercenary me.

Speaking of mercenaries, I'm writing a Viktor Petrenko novel. Man does he kick ass. In any event, I'm 29k in and headed for 70-80k. Will it sell? No idea. If you haven't read a Petrenko story, you might want to try this one.

I'll be sending my agent the first 30k words.

Speaking of sending things to my agent, last week I sent her 43k of another novel - a thrilling thriller so secret, so...secret that I can't even tell you the name of it. I will say this, many of the landmarks you hold near and dear to your heart will explode... That novel should wind up being about 90-100k. Will this sell? No idea.

I'm still in the position of writing on spec. High hopes and all that. Of course, none of this can come out with my name attached as my name is pretty much mud when it comes to people who actually want to shift books off of store shelves.

Next month I'll send my agent the first 30k of another novel. Maybe. This one is 11k in and boring me though it's intended to thrill. That might change. We'll see. Also, Survivor and The Amazing Race are starting up soon and that will cut into my writing time.

Thursday, February 05, 2009

Of Course...

The game is up. Many thanks for playing. Everyone wins! Isn't this a great blog! Auntie Knickers and Joy Seymour both win the grand prize, a half dozen books apiece. A couple of entries came via my email - they're winners too.

The thing is, there are a lot of connections between the Edgars and Hollywood. I knew that, but I had no specifics. In the end, I'm wondering whether an Edgar nom or win predicts a good film. Frankly, I haven't seen most of the films people listed. Nope. I just checked. Haven't seen a single one. I suppose that's what Netflix is for.

The winners should contact me via email. If you don't have my email address, there is a CONTACT ME page on my website. Don't worry. I'm not just trying to lure you to my website. Haven't been there myself in a while...

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Jen Jordan asked...

A very salient question. Exactly how many 90 year olds could you take on in a fight? It turns out that I score fairly low compared to some respondents at her blog, but much higher than I would have thought. How Many 90 Year Olds Could You Take in a Fight?

Monday, February 02, 2009

CONTEST! CONTEST!

Unlike most of my contests, this one actually requires that you do something to earn your reward...and it's not an easy something like putting your name down in the comments either.

I'm trying to figure out what are the links between the Mystery Writers of America and Hollywood. Specifically, are there links between Edgar nominated stories and novels and the movies.

So here's how I think this can work: The first six people to show a link ("this movie was based on that novel") will win a book. Beyond that, the best response, even if it comes it past the sixth entry (for instance, if you can show twenty links between the movies and the Edgars) will get you six books.

The MWA link might help...

Now, you might be asking yourself, "Which books?" Well, let me just say I have several, brand new, never read* novels from cozies to hardboiled including a HARD CASE CRIME and a signed Lee Child (pb) and others. So have at it. Whatever you win, I promise, it'll be worth it.



* Because previously read books are yucky...

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Nasty.Brutish.Short...

Just letting people know I posted a review in Nasty.Brutish.Short of Megan Abbott's story "Cheer." It's a dark story about cheerleaders (I know what you're thinking - "Isn't every story about cheerleaders, by definition, dark?" Yes, of couse, but this one is even darker...). And because Megan doesn't have enough hardware, she's up for a Pushcart Prize on this one. Take a look.

Friday, January 16, 2009

Congrats!

First to Joe Guglilmelli of Bonnie and Joe fame. He wins the Robert L. Fish award this year and any award that goes his way is a good thing. Good people deserve good things and Joe's good people.

And to all the nominees, of course, a hearty congrats. Well deserved.

Thursday, January 15, 2009

And the winner is...

Love! That's the name of the person who won the books, not a philosophical statement on my part. Anyway, if Love will get me an address to my email address (available on my website) I promise that's the only hoop.

To the other contestants, I will be adding your names to my next drawing which should be next week.

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Another Giveaway..

Already gave out a book this year. Now I'm wondering if anyone would like a box containg at least 1 Lee Child, 1 Will Thomas, and 1 Tom Piccirilli? Put in a comment for your chance...

Friday, January 02, 2009

The Good Son by Russel McLean, Contest Edition...

And the winner is...Patrick. Results obtained via "ennie, meanie, minie, moe." In any event, if he contacts me offline, I'll gladly send him a copy of THE GOOD SON by Russel McLean. Fabulous book - dark, gritty, a special sort of Scottish meanness to it. A mean I like to call..."Haggis Noir."

Thanks everyone for playing.

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Win The Good Son by Russel McLean

Do yourself a favor in this New Year. Add a comment to this post saying you'd like a free (though slightly used) copy of Russel McLean's Scottish PI novel, THE GOOD SON. If you don't know who Russel McLean is, I could say you must have been hiding under some kind of rock these past few years* as everyone, and I do mean EVERYONE knows Russel. Check out his blog.

He writes mean short stories for AHMM, and he's now turned his attention to the novel where, I have to say, he excels. The story concerns a man who wants to know why it is his brother committed suicide. He hires J. "Speed" McNee. Of course, there are complications - wouldn't be a PI novel if everyone told the truth the first time they were confronted, but what I like best is that McNee has a past that troubles him but really, the terrible, terrible thing that haunts him wasn't his fault. Seriously.

Anyway, see for yourself. As in previous iterations of book contests here, I'll choose a name randomly. Probably sometime tomorrow, but certainly before 2009 runs out. I'll happily ship anywhere. Even Australia. Everyone**, including minors, is eligible.

Oh, and I'll toss in a copy of my last*** book, THE CONCRETE MAZE if you don't have one. Just ask in the comment. Russel called it a "Stonker," so you'll have to judge whether that makes you want one.


* But that would be pointlessly cruel.
** Excluding Russel McLean or any of his minions.
*** I mean it in the sense of "latest" but at this point in my career, it could go either way. Seriously.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Britcom help, take 2

Thanks to Patti Abbott and Manuel Ramos for trying but neither show is the one I want. The episode I saw: two not bright men decide to turn their farmhouse into a hotel and they believe it is worth a nine star rating so that's what they put on the handpainted sign out by the road. Their first customers are a lesbian couple so after being more than a little flustered, they erase two of the stars on the sign. Box of mysteries to whoever gets the right series (because I'd like to buy and can't for the life of me identify it...)

Monday, December 08, 2008

Britcom help

If you know your Britcoms can you lend a brother a hand? In England some years ago I saw an episode of a Britcom that I've never been able to identify since - in the episode, two country bumpkins decide to turn their farmhouse into a hotel - a nine star hotel. When the first guests are a lesbian couple, one of the managers decides they can no longer consider themselves a nine-star hotel and goes out with whitewash to eliminate two of the stars on the hand drawn sign out front. Ring any bells? If so, let me know...There may be a book in it for you.

Friday, November 21, 2008

The Good Son by Russel McLean, part one

Tomorrow I'll tell you about the book itself. Today, I let you know that it arrived on Tuesday all the way from Aber-bloody-deen (or the UK at any rate) in pristine condition and with a pretty slick cover*. I paid as much in postage as the book cost itself, but I consider it worth it even though I have an electronic copy Russel was kind enough to send me a while back.

More importantly (since this is my blog...) Russel mentioned me in the acknowledgements at the back of the book. Not sure what I did or said that deserved the shout out** but it's much appreciated.

I sent an email to Craig Ferguson daring him to have Russel over on the show since it is the first Scottish PI novel in the history of the world. Of course, if Ferguson actually invites Russel over to the show, I'll tip over in a dead faint. Still, Ferguson is Scottish as is Mr. McLean and the Scottish are an unpredictable lot - Skittish Scots, we used to call them when I was growing up***.



* Slick meaning the photo is a nice one, very dramatic, eye-catching, not that something was spilled on it or anything.
** As the young people say.
*** Made that part up.

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

How We Lost the War in Iraq...(Quite Short)

Plenty of killing. No actual goal - at least not one that would stay still for more than a few days. WMDs, removing Saddam, setting up free elections, then more elections, then another round of elections, then making it so the Iraqi people could fix their infrastructure and run their government smoothly. Essentially, we're down to "We win if we can stop violence in Iraq."

Imagine someone assassinates the president of Iraq the day the last US soldier leaves. By GWBs standards, we'll have lost. Our brave young men and women are fighting and dying without an attainable goal - the greatest failure of the current president (and there are many to choose from) is that he has not yet, not to this day come up with a goal for our military that is achievable. Not to say that would have been easy, but he didn't even try.

Next it's back to crime writing news and such.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

How We Lost the War in Afghanistan (Too Long)

Years ago in a land far away...The Taliban were helping hide Osama bin Laden. The president (ours, not theirs) gave them an ultimatum which given the then recent attacks of 9/11 seemed reasonable - Give us Osama, dead or alive, in handcuffs or in a set of shoeboxes. They stood by their man and as far as we could we blasted them to crap.

At the time, I thought this was going to be a good war to fight (as far as wars can be good). Osama needed punishing, the taliban seemed happy to suffer alongside him and, apart from their desire to help our enemy, we had all heard for years that the taliban were heartless bastards willing to execute citizens for showing their ankles, etc.

Then we screwed up the whole "Catch Osama" thing. From what I understand it was mostly because Rummy and Cheney didn't want the glory of the kill going to the CIA. Simple as that. "We could catch him, but we'd rather not. Not today. Perhaps in a week or two. Call us then."

Still, we put Osama on his heels and shook the reins of power out of Taliban hands. If we pursued them in the mountains, cut them off, kept them quiet, the (what passes for) democratic government of Afghanistan could get its bearings, grow its own army become independent. The Taliban might limp away and be confined to the mountains or even die off altogether.

Nope. So sorry. That would require a huge influx of manpower - a couple of divisions more than we had to spare.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, W. promised that only the word of his generals on the ground would guide his military approach to things overseas. Unless, of course, they happen to be generals in Afghanistan and they ask for more troops, which we don't have.

So since the beginning when we routed Taliban forces, the U.S. Army has been slowly losing control of what they fought hard to win. There aren't enough troops to do the job well, so they've done the job poorly - no knock on the soldiers, mind you, but, as a for instance, they can't pacify the locals enough to stop them from growing opium to fund the Taliban. When soldiers have to walk through poppy fields without disturbing them out of fear of local reaction, it's hard to say they control the place.

In the past year or two, in fact, they haven't been able to do the job at all in some sections. The Taliban comes down out of the mountains, recruits fighters, recoups supplies, even run some towns just like they used complete with beheadings.

Could we not simply push the Taliban back into hiding? Reclaim those villages, make nice with the locals and get them on our side? Actually, no. We can't. There isn't the political will in our country (starting at the White House). Even if the next president is able to pull ALL the troops out of Iraq, it would be difficult to send any large portion (and I'd say they need half to do the job well) to Afghanistan. We're tired of war, and the next president inherits that exhaustion.

Since war is not really an option anymore (after all, plenty of people in the country couldn't tell you why we ever went to Afghanistan) then you get what General Petraeus is calling for - let's sit with the Taliban and negotiate... something. Because, as Petraeus and others will tell you, not every member of the Taliban is all that bad though, yes, each one of them would say girls should go uneducated and flashing ankle should get you beheaded, and other "world-is-flat" nonsense like gangrape is a viable punishment for a girl who talks to the wrong guy. But let's sit down with these guys (not face to face, the White House says as though that were the crucial thing) and give them back their country. Which would mean the U.S. Army has been holding the country in trust for... the Taliban. Disturbing. American soldiers fighting and dying so we can give the Taliban the reins of power...

That sounds like abject failure and loss to me.

And again, 1 - we certainly don't have the political will to expand the war. 2- the current efforts are only losing in slow motion. So the only option is, 3- negotiating with the enemy with a view towards our leaving them in power pretty much as they were on September 10, 2001.


Of course, I'm no political maven. Didn't take Poli Sci in college (I took an extra history class instead). I'd be very happy if I can be shown how we will win this war.

Tomorrow: How We Lost the War in Iraq in 2003.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The Black Hand

One of the highlights of my brief participation in this year's Bouchercon was the fact that I snagged a copy of THE BLACK HAND by WIll Thomas. Thomas is one of my favorite authors in the mystery field. His series is set in late Victorian England and has a brilliant lead detective with an assistant who actually tells the stories. Think you've heard this one before? Think this is some reheated Sherlock Holmes? You couldn't be further from the truth - not even if the truth promised to stand stock still and you got into a spaceship traveling 25,000 miles per hour on an unlimited fuel supply and you went full throttle for the rest of your life (may you be blessed with long life).

The difference between Cyrus Barker and Sherlock Holmes is like the difference between Daniel Craig's James Bond and Sean Connery's. I've never been able to watch a Sean Connery James Bond movie (though I like him enough in other projects). He always seemed more than a little ridiculous and not at all dangerous... unless you're a woman. With Holmes, while I like the tales enough, Holmes isn't much of a person to me. Watson even less so.

On the other hand, Will Thomas's characters jump to life. Barker is a bit of a superhero, but not so much that he would need a cape. In this installment, he takes on the Mafia, a secret Italian criminal society just then getting a foothold in London. Of course, the mission gets accomplished, but unlike a Holmes story, one guy gets stabbed in the face and another has his knees broken for him.

Another great read in the series.